The Crescent Nebula

The brightest part of this image is the Crescent Nebula (NGC 6888), around 5000 light-years from Earth. It was formed when stellar winds collided with gas ejected from a dying star, sending shockwaves into space. The Crescent is surrounded by huge sweeping clouds of hydrogen gas, seen here in red.

Although the Crescent Nebula itself is a bit small for my wide-angle 400mm Askar FRA400 telescope, it’s surrounded by nebulosity I figured would look good! My ZWO ASI2600MC Pro camera has a fairly large sensor, and combined with the FRA400 gives a good field of view.

To get the framing just right, I used my ASIAIR Plus‘s planetarium function. This is a relatively new feature, and it’s absolutely brilliant. It plate solves to your desired location, and draws a box to show your exact field of view. I could then rotate the camera to change the angle of the box, then take a short exposure, allowing the ASIAIR Plus to update its prediction. After five minutes I had the framing and rotation just how I wanted.

I then used the “current position of the mount” to create a Custom Object, allowing me to easily return to these exact coordinates night after night.

Although there’s essentially no proper darkness at this time of year, I’ve found that it’s still possible to get good data. For more examples, see my recent Lobster Claw Nebula and Shark Nebula, and last year’s Elephant’s Trunk Nebula, along with Controversial Opinion #7.

The nebulosity surrounding the Crescent is quite faint so I knew I’d need a long integration time, which wouldn’t be a problem as that’s what I always aim for. Despite the summer skies, and being in the cloudy UK, this project took just three weeks. I obtained 31 hours of data, and then used PixInsight’s excellent SubframeSelector tool to whittle it down to the best 25 hours (750 subframes, each being 120-seconds long). If you’re currently obtaining integration times of just a few hours, you may find this article useful.

Here are screenshots showing the final selection of subframes. I use two criteria to seperate wheat from chaff: FWHM and Stars.

Then it was onto integration, using WeightedBatchPreProcessor. Here’s the final Execution Monitor, showing the whole process took almost 21 hours. This is despite me using a powerful PC with 48GB of RAM!

The next step was processing. This was relatively straightforward, and I largely followed the steps outlined in my example processing workflow. I did deviate slightly: specifically, using Generalised Hyperbolic Stretch to take the data to non-linear; and NoiseXTerminator for noise reduction. Also, I liked the strong red colours in the image, so didn’t split the channels to create any kind of pseudo-Mono style picture.

It took a bit of teasing to get the faint nebulosity out. Use the slider below to compare a single sub-frame to the final, edited image. These slider comparisons make the whole process seem like magic!

On the left is a single, 120-second subframe; use the slider to compare with the final edited picture (750 x 120-second subframes).

Although I knew that the Crescent itself is really too small to do justice in my telescope, I did have a punt on making an extreme crop to see it better. Lightroom’s Enhance function allowed me to upscale the resolution quite effectively (and of a higher quality than I got with Topaz Gigapixel AI). The result is better than I expected. The outer shell of Oxygen, shown in blue, is quite evident:

Close crop of the Crescent Nebula.

When editing the full image, I noticed a strange tiny circular object. At first I thought it was an artifact left over from the star removal stage during processing, but it didn’t look quite right for that. I did some research and found that it’s actually the Soap Bubble Nebula, a planetary nebula. It was discovered only about 15 years ago, by an amateur astronomer using a 160mm refractor. It’s quite amazing that with modern camera sensors and processing techniques it can be imaged from the centre of a city using a small aperture (72mm) refractor. Click on the full image at the top of this page and see if you can spot the Soap Bubble. Clue if you need it: look a little below the Crescent Nebula.

The Soap Bubble Nebula.

Imaging details

* July 2022
* Bristol, UK (Bortle 8)
* Telescope: Askar FRA400 f/5.6 Quintuplet APO Astrograph
* Camera: ZWO ASI 2600MC-PRO
* Filter: Optolong L-eXtreme
* Mount: Orion Sirius EQ-G
* Guide: William Optics 32mm; ZWO ASI 120MM Mini
* Control: ASIAIR Plus, ZWO EAF
* Software: PixInsight, Photoshop, Lightroom
* 750 x 120 seconds

Total integration time: 25 hours

By Lee Pullen

Example source data

This is what a single 120-second subframe looks like, debayered and with a simple stretch.
This is the integration of 750 x 120 seconds (25 hours) just with a simple stretch, before any proper editing.


If you’ve found any of this content useful, then why not show your appreciation with the best gift of all: money!

2 thoughts on “The Crescent Nebula

  1. Luke says:

    Great to see some new content (I need to catch up on your site) – you actually inspired me to get my stuff up on a WordPress site.
    I’ve been using StarXTerminator and NoiseXTerminator a bit now .. so much so I’m re-doing some of my older content with newer processes.

    I’m impressed with your integration times! I’m still sub 4-5 hours on most targets.. I plan to beef most up to 10-15+ . I’m loving the new 16bit sensors and how sensitive they are.
    Like you, I thought the Soap Bubble was a reflection, and spent hours trying to clone it out … need to reprocess again with it back in haha!

    I couldn’t get my head around GHS, I’m still lazy.. most of my imaging is targets using the L-Extreme, so I’m using EZ Stretch and then extracting/manipulating and a channel combination as fake SHO. (although I have a SII/OIII Dualband filter on back order..)

    Take care, clear skies!
    Luke

    Reply
    1. Lee says:

      Thanks for the comment Luke! Give GHS a good go, it can give great results 🙂

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *