Review: Askar M54 Off-Axis Guider (OAG)

Close-up view of an Askar M54 Off-Axis Guider

REVIEW:
Askar M54 Off-Axis Guider (OAG)

First published February 2026


Intro

I’ve recently upgraded my guiding setup, replacing my William Optics 50mm guidescope with an Askar M54 Off-Axis Guider paired with a ZWO ASI 220MM guide camera. In this review, I look at whether the move to an off-axis guider was worth it, how it compares to a traditional guidescope, and whether it helps me get the most from my StellarDrive X 6R PRO mount when imaging from an urban location.

Guidescopes and OAGs

Guiding is a vital part of any astrophotography rig. The simplest way is to have a separate little telescope, called a guidescope, with a small camera attached to it. The purpose of this duo is to watch the stars very carefully; any movement could indicate that your mount isn’t tracking accurately enough. The camera can then communicate with your mount using whichever software you favour (I use an ASIAIR Plus), and then correct the error in real-time. Pretty snazzy eh?

It’s a system that works well, but there are some drawbacks. The main one is called differential flexure, which is when the guidescope moves a little (numerous things can cause this) and the whole system gets confused. Also, balancing a telescope becomes more difficult when you’ve got a guidescope attached off-centre. And guidescopes have wider imaging angles (i.e. lower focal lengths) than main telescopes, meaning their data is coarser.

The general rule of thumb is that guidescopes are generally ok for wide-field telescopes (say, under 800mm or so). Beyond that and you’ll likely run into these hurdles. At this point you may be better ditching the guidescope and going for another approach: the Off-Axis Guider, or OAG for short.

These fit into your imaging train and use a prism to divert a little bit of light from your telescope into the guidecamera. This neatly solves the problems of a guidescope; specifically, no differential flexure, easier telescope balancing, and your guidecamera sees high quality data (as it’s using light collected from your main telescope).

Sounds good, so what’s the downside? Well, your guidecam will have a smaller field of view than if you were using a guidescope, due to the longer focal length. So, you need a guidecam with a decently-sized sensor. (I’ve had success with a ZWO ASI 220MM). And OAGs are known to be a bit fiddly to set up. So let’s discuss that next…

Setting up

After receiving my Askar M54 OAG, I went about installing it into my imaging train, which includes an Askar 130PHQ telescope and ZWO ASI 2600MC camera. OAGs have a reputation for being tricky to set up, but the good news is that the Askar M54 OAG has a few tricks up its sleeve to make things easier.

First up is a good-sized prism (10mm x 10mm) with which to pinch some of the telescope’s light and divert it to the guidecamera.

In order to work, it needs to be rotated to the correct angle. Basically, the top of the prism should be parallel to your main camera sensor’s long edge, but not blocking it. This photo shows what I mean:

The Askar M54 OAG comes with a whole load of adapters so that it will not only fit pretty much any telescope system, but can also be rotated so you can get the right angle. This was a reason I opted for the Askar OAG and not the ZWO equivalent; that one doesn’t come with all these adapters. And, wouldn’t you know, I did need some of the kit that Askar bundled with theirs. It’s really annoying when you need to buy extra adapters, and I appreciate Askar’s approach here: just throw loads of useful things in the box.

Image of an Askar M54 Off-Axis Guider with the included accessories: M54 frontal gasket, M48 telescope adapter, M42 telescope adapter, M54 camera adapter, M48 camera adapter, M42 camera adapter
Credit: Askar.

So after all that I had the Askar OAG and guidescope attached, as shown below. (Note that after taking this photo I realised that the guidescope needs to be inserted further into the OAG to gain focus. After doing that it doesn’t stuck out as much).

I then took a test photo and realised that the prism was protruding too far down, and so casting a shadow onto the main camera sensor. This is what that looks like in reality; the big dark shadow at the top is the prism’s shadow:

ASIAIR screenshot with a dark patch at the top

Askar have anticipated this. The prism is on a kind of metal stalk, and the OAG comes with an Allen key that can be used to loosen a screw that holds this stalk in place. It’s then a simple procedure to adjust its height. After a few trial-and-error attempts, I had it perfectly positioned.

Next comes focussing. The first step here is to ensure that your main imaging camera is in focus. Then, you need to physically move the guidecam higher and lower until it too is in focus. The Askar M54 OAG comes with a helical focusser that allows for precision fine-tuning of the focus, and this makes things easier. The general advice is to do as much of this as you can during daytime, by pointing your telescope at something on the horizon, like a distant house chimney. Then you’re in the ball-park, and can do your fine tuning at night under the stars.

And that’s about it for set-up. Some good news: once that’s all done, you basically lock things down and never think about them again.

Askar M54 OAG in use

The results are really good, and the Askar M54 OAG performs as advertised. On my first night out with my new Stellardrive X 6R Pro mount I was able to achieve fairly consistent guiding with a total RMS between 0.3″ and 0.4″, with it occasionally dipping as low as 0.22″. When I tried with my guidescope, it was generally above 0.7″.

Note though that a guidecamera with a relatively large and sensitive sensor is definitely recommended in order to make the most of this OAG. A ZWO 220MM is a good match.

To conclude then, I can give the Askar M54 Off-Axis Guider a big thumbs up. It’s well made, reasonably priced, comes with lots of useful adapter, and works as well as you’d hope.

I’m a convert to OAGs for longer focal length systems; the guiding performance boost I’m seeing with my 1000mm Askar 130PHQ telescope is impressive. Losing the hefty weight of a guidescope is a bonus too.

Good job, Askar!

Where to buy

Affiliate links help support the site at no extra cost to you.



Discover more from Urban Astrophotography

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *