The Butterfly Nebula | IC 1318

The Butterfly Nebula IC 1318 in Cygnus, imaged from a light polluted urban sky

THE BUTTERFLY NEBULA

IC 1318 • Emission nebula • Cygnus • 4000 light-years from Earth


🗓️
July & August 2023

Overview

The Butterfly Nebula, also known as IC 1318, lies around 4000 light years from Earth and forms part of the wider Sadr region in the constellation Cygnus. Centred near the bright star Gamma Cygni, this area is rich in glowing gas and complex dark structures shaped by ongoing star formation. Although this image spans roughly 80 light years in physical size, the region covers only a tiny patch of sky, about twice the width of a thumbnail held at arm’s length, highlighting just how vast these structures are despite their subtle appearance from Earth.

Background

Cygnus is high overhead as seen from the UK this time of year, and it’s full of intricate nebulae. My Askar 130PHQ telescope has a focal length of 1000mm, which means it’s well suited for tight framing, detail-oriented shots. For this project I chose the Butterfly Nebula (not to be confused by a planetary nebula with the same name) because it looked interesting and would entirely fill the frame edge-to-edge.

As is now my standard practice for these types of nebulae, I used an Optolong L-Ultimate filter for and OIII data; an Askar D2 filter for SII and more OIII; and then no filter just for the stars, to give them fairly accurate colours. So it’s an SHO image from an OSC camera. In terms of integration times, the L-Ultimate is 15 hours; D2 is 20 hours; and the no filter RGB stars is just 30 minutes (stars are really bright so you don’t need much time on them).

The Butterfly Nebula IC 1318 in Cygnus, imaged from a light polluted urban sky
Framed astrophoto taken from a light-polluted city, available to buy as a fine art print

Close-ups

  • Close-up showing dense structures within the nebulosity
  • Close-up showing some darker areas
  • Close-up focussing on fine detail
  • Close-up of a particularly dramatic area

Science

I was surprised to discover that I’d actually managed to image two extremely faint planetary nebulae that are within the Butterfly Nebula. They have the official designations PK078+0.01, and PK079+0.01.

Don’t let the name fool you: planetary nebulae aren’t actually anything to do with planets. Rather, they’re shells of gas being released from low-mass stars reaching the ends of their lives. Early astronomers thought they looked a bit like the disks of planets when seen through their telescopes, and the name stuck.

Imaging details

Date

19 July – 24 August 2023 (five weeks)

Location

Bristol, UK (Bortle 8)

Telescope

Askar 130PHQ Flatfield Astrograph

Camera

ZWO ASI 2600MC Pro

Mount

Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro

Guiding

WO 50mm + ZWO 120MM Mini

Control

ASIAIR Plus

Software

PixInsight, Lightroom

Image by

Lee Pullen

Filter

Channels

Exposure

No filter

RGB (stars)

15 × 2-minutes (30 minutes)

Optolong L-Ultimate

Hα / OIII

450 × 2-minutes (15 hours)

Askar Colour Magic D2

SII / OIII

600 × 2-minutes (20 hours)

35.5 hours

Imaging details

Date
1–16 August 2025

Location
Bristol, UK (Bortle 8)

Telescope
Askar 130PHQ Flatfield Astrograph

Camera
ZWO ASI 2600MC Pro

Mount
Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro

Guiding
WO 50mm + ZWO ASI 120MM Mini

Control
ASIAIR Plus

Software
PixInsight, Lightroom

Image by
Lee Pullen

Filters

No filter
RGB (stars)
15 × 2-minutes (30 minutes)

Optolong L-Ultimate
Hα / OIII
450 × 2-minutes (15 hours)

Askar Colour Magic D2
SII / OIII
600 × 2-minutes (20 hours)

Total exposure: 35.5 hours

Kit list

This is the equipment I used to capture the image.
Affiliate links help support the site at no extra cost to you.

William Optics 50mm with ROTO Lock guidescope

Guidescope: William Optics 50mm with ROTO Lock
Read my review

Buy from Astroshop.eu
Buy from High Point Scientific

Processing

I’m receiving a lot of requests for a processing guide for this approach, and I plan to make one soon. Meanwhile, I made what I think is an interesting comparison of the data sources. I took just the Optolong L-Ultimate data and made a rough edit, producing a starless image. Then I did the same thing with the Askar D2. You can compare them using the slider:

Left is Optolong L-Ultimate data (Ha/OIII); right is Askar D2 (SII/OIII).

The L-Ultimate data is better quality despite the lower integration time, simply because there’s so much in the nebula. But the D2 is clearly bringing a different wavelength into the mix. My final image is the result of mixing L-Ultimate and D2 data, with RGB stars sprinkled in top.

There are methods of creating pseudo-SHO images from just the stronger /OIII data. Perhaps best-known nowadays is the Bill Blanshan Pixinsight script that does this with a single click. For interest, I ran this script on my L-Ultimate data and gave it a very quick edit:

Pseudo-SHO image from produced by running Bill Blanshan's script on the L-Ultimate data
Pseudo-SHO image from produced by running Bill Blanshan’s script on my L-Ultimate data.

I much prefer the version with Askar D2 data added, although admittedly it’s a far longer total exposure time and was more fiddly to process.

Example astrophotography image promoting one-to-one online astrophotography masterclasses

Example source data

Here are example single subframes and freshly integrated stacks, just with simple stretches applied.

Seestar S50 image

This photo of the Butterfly Nebula was taken using my Seestar S50 telescope.






Discover more from Urban Astrophotography

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *