REVIEW:
PixInsight Astrophotography Software
First published December 2021
Last updated January 2026
Intro
Image processing is a critical part of astrophotography, shaping the final result just as much as the telescope or camera used to capture the data. PixInsight is one of the most powerful processing tools available to astrophotographers, but it also has a reputation for being difficult to learn. In this review, I look at what PixInsight offers in practice, why I use it, and whether it might be a good fit for your own astrophotography workflow.
A complete package
Back in the day I used DeepSkyStacker and Photoshop for my astro editing. This combination worked ok, but then a friend suggested I check out PixInsight. I’d heard that it was difficult to learn, but decided to give it a go. I’m certainly glad I did.
PixInsight offers a complete package for editing your astrophotos. Its core approach could be described as methodical and mathematical. This is aptly demonstrated by SubframeSelector, one of the first functions used in a processing project. SubframeSelector analyses the subframes you’ve taken and grades them based on criteria you select, such as star sharpness (FWHM measurements) or number of stars visible. In this way you can actually graph the quality of your data, and be sure only the best goes into your stack – much more reliable than making estimates by eye.
PixInsight has yet more excellent pre-processing steps, with its new NormalizeScaleGradient being worthy of particular praise. This is very effective for removing gradients from your images, meaning that, for example, a new lease of life is given to subframes shot under heavy moonlight, and is key to #6 in my list of controversial opinions.
Once you have an integrated image, you can begin your processing the PixInsight way: slow and steady, one step at a time. There are so many functions available to edit your photos that it’s dizzying, but my advice to newcomers is not to be put off. Most functions work very well using their default options, and you can produce stunning images in around a dozen or so steps. Thought of like that, it becomes much more manageable. You could spend a lifetime mastering PixInsight’s intricacies, but you certainly don’t need to.
Steep learning curve
The main criticism that can be levelled at PixInsight is that it’s undeniably difficult for new users to get a grasp of. The initial learning curve is very steep, and at first it’s a real scramble getting to grips with the basics just so you can produce a pleasing image. The reference documentation is intimidating to say the least, aimed more at those that want detailed technical information than casual users. PixInsight is also regularly updated, which overall is good, but does mean that online tutorials are often out of date.
There are lots of tutorials out there though, and I have plenty on the Urban Astrophotography YouTube channel.
The good news is that if you can stick with that steep climb, the view at the top is worth it! With the basics under your belt, the real power of PixInsight becomes evident. Each time you process an image you learn a little more, and it’s rewarding to reprocess old data using new skills, producing ever-better end results.
Any other downsides? Well, there’s the price, with a licence costing just shy of £200. That’s more expensive that other options, but it’s still cheap compared to most aspects of this hobby!
Also, a powerful computer is needed to make the most of PixInsight, especially if you want intensive processes like integrating to complete in a timely fashion. I have 48GB of RAM and it still takes several hours to integrate. Then again, I shoot a lot of subs…
Is PixInsight the best processing software?
The slightly unsatisfying answer is that is might be, if it’s a good match for you. There’s a lot of software out there you can use to process your images, and they’re all capable of brilliant results. It comes down to what “clicks” with you. I really like the data-driven approach of PixInsight. It encourages me to think critically about the quality of my data and how far I can push it. But I must admit I have a lot of fun when I get to the stage of pinging an image into Lightroom to tweak the settings there. (I’m a professional photographer, and use Lightroom a lot!)
My recommendation is to download the free trial of PixInsight and give it a good go. Clear your diary for a day or so if possible, and really try to getting to grips with it. You might fall in love with it; or not, and that’s OK as there are plenty more astro-processing fish in the sea!
Book a Masterclass
One-on-one online tuition.
Art Store
Own a fine art print from the gallery.
Donate
Help me fight the spam bots!
Discover more from Urban Astrophotography
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
3 thoughts on “Review: PixInsight Astrophotography Software”