
Quasar J08570+1534
Cancer • 26 billion light-years from Earth
🔭
Askar 130PHQ
📷
ZWO 2600MC Pro
🌃
Bortle 8
⏱️
8 hours
🗓️
April 2026

Overview
I’ve done quite a bit of work imaging quasars recently, and think that J08570+1534 is the most distant object it’s realistically possible for me to image from Bristol. It’s a quasar, and the light I captured is around 12.5 billion years old. The Universe has been expanding during that epic journey, moving Earth and the quasar further apart, so that currenty it’s in the region of 26 billion light-years away!
Background
To locate it Quasar J08570+1534, I used the Custom Object function in my ASIAIR and entered the following J2000 coordinates:
RA: 8h 57m 04s
Dec: +15° 34′ 26″

Science
Quasars are supermassive black holes at the centres of galaxies. We can see them because material is falling in, being superheated, and so become incredibly bright as a side-effect.
Although my image is just a few blurry pixels, what it represents is quite mind-blowing: a supermassive black hole, the light from which began its journey when the Universe was only around 1.3 billion years old, which is 10% of its current age. The quasar is also very faint, having a magnitude of 19.38.
To expand on this a little, the quasar has a redshift of z = 4.57. This means that the light captured in my image has been travelling for roughly 12.5 billion years. The Universe has been expanding during that entire journey, so the quasar is now about 26 billion light-years away (in today’s comoving distance). Comoving distance is a way astronomers measure how far apart objects are while considering the expansion of the Universe. As the light was crossing space, space itself was stretching, so the quasar has been carried further away the whole time. That’s why its present-day distance is much larger than the 12.5 billion light-years the light actually travelled. This stuff makes my head hurt!
I think it’s fair to say that J08570+1534 is the most distant object that I can see with my equipment from Bristol. (There are some quasars that are slightly further away, but they’re a lot fainter and would need hugely longer integration times, so I don’t really consider them realistic possibilities).

Kit list
This is the equipment I used to capture the image.
Affiliate links help support the site at no extra cost to you.

Telescope: Askar 130PHQ
Read my review
Buy from Astroshop.eu
Buy from High Point Scientific

Camera: ZWO ASI 2600MC Pro
Read my review
Buy from Astroshop.eu
Buy from High Point Scientific

Mount: StellarDrive X 6R PRO
Read my review
Buy EQ6-R PRO from Astroshop.eu
Buy EQ6-R PRO from High Point Scientific
Rebuilt into a StellarDrive X 6R PRO by DarkFrame Optics.

Askar M54 Off-Axis Guider
Read my review
Buy from Astroshop.eu
Buy from High Point Scientific

ZWO ASI 220MM Mini
Read my review
Buy from Astroshop.eu
Buy from High Point Scientific

Control: ASIAIR Plus
Read my review
Buy from Astroshop.eu
Buy from High Point Scientific

Filter: Optolong L-Quad Enhance
Read my review
Buy from Astroshop.eu
Buy from High Point Scientific
Example source data
Here’s an example single subframe and freshly integrated stack, just with simple stretches applied.


Seestar S50 image
I had a crack at imaging this quasar from my city centre location using my Seestar S50 telescope. I collected 91 minutes of data, which unfortunately seems far below what’s needed. I don’t think it’s really a practical target for a Seestar in a city! Check below the full image for a close-up comparison with my Askar 130PHQ data (which has 8 hours of integration).



Donate
If you’ve found this content useful, please consider donating to help support the site!
Discover more from Urban Astrophotography
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


